Brazil prosecutors ask court to remove Vale managers over safety concerns

 Federal prosecutors in Brazil’s Minas Gerais state are seeking a court order for miner Vale SA to replace executives they accuse of disregarding safety methods in the aftermath of two deadly mining disasters.

They have asked a court in Minas Gerais to name an interventor to take charge of Vale’s safety programme, according to a statement the prosecutors’ office shared with Reuters.

The prosecutors have also asked all dividend payments be suspended until the interventor confirms Vale is cooperating.

Vale plans to resume payouts next month, which Fitch estimates will come in at more than $2 billion for the year.

The request would require approval by the court.

Vale could not be immediately reached for a comment outside regular business hours.

Prosecutors said they want the interventor to identify, within 15 days, executive managers and other top management members who should be replaced in a corporate reshuffle.

The interventor would be charged with drawing up a plan to reshape Vale’s governance system to comply with international standards for disaster prevention, the prosecutors said.

The governance system currently adopted by the mining company has generated extensive damage to society and to the environment, the prosecutors say.

The so-called Brumadinho task force of prosecutors was set up after a January 2019 disaster at a Vale mine where a dam burst, killing 270 people.

An earlier dam burst occurred in 2015 at a mine in Mariana owned jointly by Vale and BHP Group Ltd causing Brazil’s worst environmental disaster.

The prosecutors said that, contrary to what Vale has stated and the data it discloses, it has developed over time an internal culture that is unable to recognise safety threats.

The company acts on “corporate irresponsibility”, they say, and needs a reshuffle to change its culture to start taking preventative safety measures.

Earlier on Wednesday, Vale said it put on watch three dams and three dikes after failing to meet the security requirements during regular reviews by third party auditors.

Leave a Reply